[s4s] Tribune

fugg u even if he did have a girlfriend, he would've quickly been displeased with how women truly are and their disgusting nature, he would've hated them and gone ER regardless. He would've hated women more if he actually had one. >>12648527
you know that females are 50% of the human population, right?
they are not monolithic in personality or nature
some are good, some are bad
this isn't a very difficult concept to grasp
we're not talking about a fringe minority >>12648533
They all have the same disgusting nature, a woman is a woman. If you hate what they inherently all are, you hate them all. >>12648533
dubs olf truth >>12648527
>>12648536
what no pussy does to a muthafucka >>12648561
I've had girlfriends before, once you date enough you realize all women are the same. >>12648562
skill issue >>12648562
lol no they're not
you were only able to pick up the most low-value women out there because you're a semi-retarded piece of shit yourself
so of course you're going to be biased
the only sample size you've tested is from the absolute bottom of the barrel
because that's the best you can get >>12648565
>throws a random dart in the dark hoping it lands on something

>>12648566
Blah blah blah buncha random assumptions you don't know me asshole, you don't know shit, you're just talking to me the same way you would talk to yourself if you wanted to bring yourself down. >>12648562
all men who thinke like this are the same too because they use the faces and words and formeposts and edits of other people to convey their hateful ideas and dont fully know how to understand the experiences and hardships of anyone diferent from them >>12648589
lol it's not an assumption to say you're retarded >>12648589
I was alluding to the fact you're too stupid to recognize the pattern and break it >>12648604
he's a stranger on the internet that you truly know nothing about, so yes it's an assumption. >>12648646
well he says retarded shit so I'm going to assume he's retarded >>12648648
that's subjective. If anything you're the retard for not seeing that your subjectivity does not confirm any objective truth. >>12648589
>>12648646
samefag tbh >>12648658
>Doctor: Ma'am, I hate to tell you this. But we're diagnosing your child with severe mental retardation.
>you're mom: that's subjective. If anything you're the retard for not seeing that your subjectivity does not confirm any objective truth. >>12648669
Oh no! two separate people disagree with me!? That's impossible! Surely it's a samefag! even worse, I'm sure they're using their normal IP AND A VPN!!1! because there's just NO WAY 2 people would disagree with me! nuh-uh! I'm gonna pwn that person and claim they're a safefag even though I have no proof! Yes, this will make me feel smart. >>12648673
excuse me but who are you quoting? >>12648675
there's like 6 people total who still post on this board
if there's two posts in a thread with the same style expressing the same opinion on [s4s], there's like a 98% chance it's the same person >>12648675
lol u mad? >>12648681
you still took a random shot at a claim. You also have no proof exactly how many people post on this board and yes, it's possible 2 people disagree with you. >>12648677
unchecked doubles on the last page! >>12648508
The problem is, OP, that you probably aren't seeing all the posts. If you are just viewing [s4s] through the /s4s/ board, you don't see the green posts, the posts with letters in their ids, or anything numberless. Together, those make up about 40-70 percent of [s4s], depending on the day. So conversation will appear disjointed and spastic, because you won't be getting the full picture.

I actually just flipped over to the /s4s/ interface to make this post, and it's pretty funny how unintelligible [s4s] is like this >>12648682
u mad nigger >>12648508
Huu ihz zis mahn?!?!?!?