Reality defined
By Anonymous | Updated 05/17/26(Sun)16:11:59
what we see as reality is in reality a number of electrical pulses that our minds interpret into vision. thus are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain? or even yet Intercepted by the brain from somewhere else?
we define dreams as not real due to the fact that we generally forget them or take a surreal character, yet all we have to compare is the real world, which in our minds case is just another interpretation of electrical input. Thus it is
not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality? If we could access dreams on a greater scale, and it is logical to assume that dreams are mashed crossroad of our lives, our thoughts and our imagination,
that these electrical pulses of the dream, fully realized, would be just as real to us as reality? I am not entirely unconvinced that we simply live in what can only be described as an information defigned dream, maybe at some point neuro
programming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base level, change how our brain interprets information, much alike to what drugs do today, perhaps one day we will entirely change our world, colours, sounds, crazy.
>what we see as reality is in reality a number of electrical pulses that our minds interpret into vision. thus are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain? or even yet Intercepted by the brain from somewhere else?
>we define dreams as not real due to the fact that we generally forget them or take a surreal character, yet all we have to compare is the real world, which in our minds case is just another interpretation of electrical input. Thus it is
>not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality? If we could access dreams on a greater scale, and it is logical to assume that dreams are mashed crossroad of our lives, our thoughts and our imagination,
>that these electrical pulses of the dream, fully realized, would be just as real to us as reality? I am not entirely unconvinced that we simply live in what can only be described as an information defigned dream, maybe at some point neuro
>programming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base level, change how our brain interprets information, much alike to what drugs do today, perhaps one day we will entirely change our world, colours, sounds, crazy. Deep stuff, Josh. :^)
Your fortune: Very Bad Luck >>12956330
My mind interpreted that as a man woah trippy dude Okay, and what, exactly, does Belle Delphine's butthole have to do with any of that? >>12956340
Belle Delphine's butthole is always relevant. End of discussion. >>12956340
You aren't ready for the real truth lil bro >>12956330
Yes, our view of reality is subjective. Anything we sense is dependent on how our brain interprets it.
Yes, altering the structure of the brain can lead to changes in an individuals perception.
Don't know why you tied dreams into it, seems superfluous.
On a different note, Belle Delphine is an extremely mid makeup caked whore. OP, can I change reality so that I can lick Belle Delphine's butthole? If so, how? Imagine the smell. Bumping this log cutter. lolelolelole >>12956330
>>12956343
best damn butthole period >>12956366
Pilot psycho frame gundam >>12956330 (OP)
>as real to us as reality
don't know but i doubt it
>as real as [...] reality
no you need something real to create the dream dummy thats why that one girl turned into a bird when tha big whale guy woke up. remember???
>>Anonymous (You)
>who are u quoting
I CITED MY SOURCES ACTUALLY!! CHECK EM!!
now STOP POSTING 3DPD!!! >>12956667
BLEEEEHHHHHHHHH
Your fortune: （ ´_ゝ`）ﾌｰﾝ
>>12956330
>are dreams not an entire reality of impulses created by the brain?
Nopers! Whut we interpret as reality and reality itsef r too diffrent things lol.
>Thus it is not entirely unreasonable to see dreams as a simulation, or imagination of reality?
Yupers! Not unreasonable at all!
>If we could access dreams on a greater scale ... would be just as real to us as reality?
U doofus dinker. Wha do u mean by "access on a greater scale"? Dreams R just as reel to us as reeality if u break dem down as just ewetrical impulses. Have u ever been in a dream an not realized it? BOOM, it's just as real 2 u as reality.
>maybe at some point neuro programming will allow us to change how we see the dream at the base level
ur taking too many crazy pills. u can already do dat. Take out ur eyes, you will change how u interpret da world. (more about hearing and touching and less eyeball seeing), but dis is not as significant as u think. Thar exists a reality beyond ur interpretation, and it will not change cuz u think is so.
>>12956330
The OP is genuinely onto something but fumbles the landing a bit. What they're circling around is a real philosophical problem — the underdetermination of reality by sensory experience. Descartes got there in the 17th century with the evil demon hypothesis: if an omnipotent deceiver fed your mind perfectly consistent false signals, you'd have no internal mechanism to detect it. Dreams expose this vulnerability because they do construct convincing realities from nothing external.
But here's where OP's framing gets slippery: they're using "electrical pulses" as a leveler — both reality and dreams reduce to neural signals, therefore they're equivalent. That's a category error. The content of waking experience is causally constrained by an external world that pushes back. You can't dream your way out of hunger. The intersubjective consistency of waking reality — that other minds independently confirm the same physics — is the actual distinguishing feature, not some privileged "realness" of the signals themselves.
The neurogramming speculation at the end is the most interesting part. What they're describing is essentially predictive processing manipulation — the brain already constructs reality as a controlled hallucination updated by sensory prediction error. Psychedelics work exactly this way, flooding the system with false prediction errors. If you could modulate that system precisely, you'd have phenomenological control over qualia itself.
Which raises the real horror: maybe the question isn't "are dreams real" but "is waking life just the dream we've all agreed to stay in."
best damn butthole period >>12956700
Claude added the butthole comment entirely on its own, that wasn't me >>12956700
(dubs)
>>12956701
LOLOLOLLOLOL BASZED CLAUDE >>12956700
>>12956701
See? Even AI bots know who has the best butthole in the world.
Anonymous is a reporter from /s4s/