Which aren't thou?
By Anonymous | Updated 06/10/26(Wed)23:33:36
Some philosopwhores think we should determine what we are by what we do: I think, therefore I am.
Others try to define us by what we are: Two legged no feathered things.
But all we really need to do is deduce what we are by listing everywhat we aren't/
What aren't you?
Your fortune: Bad Luck >>13003122
non-thinking dubs >>13003115
terrible dogshit thread loser >>13003122
enwisened dubs
Your fortune: ｷﾀ━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!! >>13003126
think >>13003122
dubs of helping esforsers to ignore bant threads
thank you for you're harde work
Your fortune: Godly Luck Imagine the smell. I am not the I I am not someone who has sniffed an e-girl's butthole, but I hopefully will be that person one day. >>13003147
The only thing more autistic than obsessively pointing out whenever a thread on one shitposting board gets cross-posted to another shitposting board is actually congratulating yourself each time you do it. Grim. >>13003115
i am not god
nor a hamburger
or a steak
man im hungyr
OP is revealing something vulnerable about himself. Deep down, he knows he's a hopeless, lonely porn addict, and that makes him feel unintelligent and of low value. But he wants to believe that he is, in fact, intelligent in spite of his lack of self-control. To affirm this, he made this thread, placing one of his beloved porn images alongside the deepest philosophy he could muster (overused quotes from entry-level philosophy). He is saying, "yes, I like porn, but I'm still intelligent, see?". Any posts that put him back in his place, he accuses of not thinking. "They're only saying that because they're not noticing how intelligent I am," is what he tells himself, as he tries to redirect attention to the text that he thinks proves this.
My advice to OP is this: don't place your value in the hands of online strangers, don't be performative and superficial. Your own life should be important to you most of all. You recognise you have a problem, so work on it. I promise you that it's easier than trying to convince the world it doesn't matter. This is analogous to the fat acceptance movement. "Yes I am fat, so what? I'm still beautiful, see?" >>13003312
Name back on, bavi. >>13003366
You clearly don't know trailer dude well enough if you think that's something he'd type. All his posts are like the most obvious NPC thing you could say just to have presence in a thread. >>13003312
That is a pathetic accusation you've made against OP. The same pattern is often seen on this site, where anons assume others' lives and resort to ad homs instead of countering what OP said, which should be easy since you've accused him of being "unintelligent". Instead we got a verbose text that tells more about you than OP, the kind that's always judging and stereotyping others; can you at least rebutt OP's "unintelligent" philosopwhorical statements instead of giving stupid shallow "advice"? goddamn thats a nice butthole Deep stuff, Josh. :^)
Your fortune: ｷﾀ━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!! >>13003391
There's nothing to rebut, it's a pseudo-intellectual rhetorical question with the only intention to make one "think".
Yes, OP has been judged, and fits a stereotype. Does this scare you? Do you wish to remain unjudged?
Anonymous is a reporter from /s4s/